7HZ Timeless II

Its peak

While the Timeless Original was already interesting, this IEM improves on aspects such as dynamics, timbre, and depth.
Added to the quality already present with the previous product, this 7Hz Timeless II is a great option for this price. I'm not mistaken when I say it's generally superior to the Aether, Timeless AE, S12 Pro, and so on.
If you want more information, check out my YouTube channel, where you'll find more comprehensive videos or short videos with condensed information. I also do reviews on headfi.

7hz Timeless II Review - Upgraded over the classic?
Pros: - Clean, balance tonality
- Classic quick planar bass speed
- Clean midrange
- Not shouty
- Definitely an improvement over the OG 7hz Timeless
- Surprisingly good timbre
- Great technicalities
- Nice aluminum case
- Great stock cable with good modular connector
- Wide variety of eartips
Cons: - Condensation issue
- Expensive overall
Read more of my review here: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/7hz-timeless-ii-14-5mm-planar-universal-iem.27766/reviews#review-38179

It's good to go beyond my imagination.
Read more reviews at the link below.

https://blog.naver.com/andongflamestrike/223704911620

7HZ Timeless II

Have the letshouer s12, 7hz timeless AE, and the FIIO FP3. By far I prefer the timeless 2 as it is more refined and layered than all the others. Love it

The original timeless were some of my first serious iem's. These improve on those in every regards. Definitely worth the wait and the money $$$

missing the detail and soundstage that the original had. the different nozzles can play around with it some, but ultimately it's still little trade-offs in the eq that fall short. the timeless AE by comparison is more detailed, wider soundstaged, fuller with more forward mids, and louder despite both being around 15ohms. sub bass is bumped higher than the original, that's about it.
on its own merit without comparing it to it's brothers, id say it's totally fine, but definitely not at the price point. i wouldn't pay more than 100 for them. kinda like the eternal, i really wanted to like them, and tried so hard to find the niche or magic combination but they just fall short. such a shame too because they look incredible.

The character of the sound is bright, clean, detailed, with a well-presented sub-bass.
The headphones have a bias towards the upper key.
Headphones like more power, and it is with a powerful source, even if it is budgetary, that they are able to open up and show the scale and filling of the scene.
I used different dac amplifiers and a couple of audio players and came to the conclusion that soft music sources or devices with a neutral pitch would be more suitable for Timeless 2.
Exclude sources with technical sound.

Initially, the vocals attract attention, they have high resolution and clarity of diction.
The performer stands out significantly against the background of the arrangement, the backing vocals are also well emphasized.
The voices of the performers are really lively, the smallest nuances are readable.
The vocals are clear to the point of transparency, as if floating in the air.
Whistling and hissing sounds are highlighted, but do not turn into sibilants.
The stage is quite wide, cone-shaped or trapezoidal, depending on the source.
As the power increases, the atmosphere in the scene fills up, becoming more dense and lively.
The listener is located in the first third of the hall.

The upper frequencies have a silvery color, they are more prone to a cold shade of sound.
There is an emphasis in the area of 8 and after 12 kHz, so the tops are detailed and abundant.
They may seem a little thin at some points, but they sound beautiful.
The percussion and cymbals of the drum kit are heard crumbly-separately, with the presence of the necessary granularity.

The midrange range is very similar to the Simgot ET142
The same impeccable presentation of live acoustic instruments.
An excellent acoustic guitar and an incredibly lively and realistic saxophone.
I would like to add a little physicality to the piano.
Electric guitars on effects are textured and aggressive, as they should be.

Low frequencies, namely sub-bass, deserve special praise.
The infrasound digs deep enough, becoming intelligible already at 20 hz, and specifically declares itself from 25 hz.
It has a pronounced texture and fills the scene with volume.
I want a little more mid-bass to add density to the sound, since the shift in tonality to the upper part of the range concentrates attention on itself.
Nevertheless, the bottom is quite enough and it is really good.
Metal sounds massive, with powerful low-frequency support.
Orchestral works also surprise with the massiveness of the big drum, the sound of which is perceived as rolling thunderclaps.

I recommend 7Hz Timeless II for metal (except classical heavy/hard), any electronics, orchestra, vocal works, folk rock, jazz.
Headphones with a clear, juicy pitch, aimed at fans of bright sound.
They will make great friends with musical, warm and neutral sources.
It's a good model that you can safely add to your collection.

My Timeless II included a total of four sets of nozzles. There were no instructions or information included in the package. What is the point of all the nozzles and the use case for each?

The cable is bulky, and I'm not a fan of 2-pin connectors.

The sound is good, but I can't tell if they're better then the Timeless in this regard.